<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>717 Madison Place</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.717madisonplace.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.717madisonplace.com</link>
	<description>Oral Arguments and the Federal Circuit</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Senate Judiciary Committee Sends Raymond Chen Nomination to Full Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5972</link>
		<comments>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5972#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate Judiciary Committee voted this past Thursday to approve the nomination of Raymond Chen to the Federal Circuit.  Solicitor Chen&#8217;s nomination will now move to the full Senate for consideration.  [Link]
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5972</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judges Michel, Gajarsa, and Posner on Patent System</title>
		<link>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5970</link>
		<comments>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5970#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federalist Society has posted the video of the recent conference entitled &#8220;Is the Patent System Working or Broken? A Discussion with Four Distinguished Federal Judges.&#8221;  That conference was held on May 14th and featured Circuit Judges Michel (ret.) and Gajarsa (ret.), as well as Judge Posner.  The link for the video is available here.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5970</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Circuit Bench and Bar Conference 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5966</link>
		<comments>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5966#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 02:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Circuit will be holding its 15th Annual Bench and Bar Conference on June 19th-22nd at the Broadmoor in Colorado Springs, Colorado.  You can view the agenda here.
I believe at least one of the judges might be speaking to the Colorado Bar Association prior to the conference.  I&#8217;ll post that information as it becomes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5966</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Lourie on &#8220;Aro I&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5962</link>
		<comments>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5962#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 23:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was curious whether Judge Lourie had ever relied upon the Supreme Court case of Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., 365 U.S. 336 (1961) (&#8221;Aro I&#8221;) in the opinions that he has authored for the court.  It turns out that he has. Here are some examples.
This court, however, has rejected a claim [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5962</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Taranto Era Begins</title>
		<link>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5957</link>
		<comments>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5957#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 02:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Circuit Judge Richard Taranto sat for his first oral argument at the Federal Circuit yesterday.  Chief Judge Rader offered these welcoming remarks: [Listen].
The Federal Circuit also has a visiting judge this month.  Judge Dee Benson of the District of Utah heard oral arguments today at the Federal Circuit.  Judge Benson and Judge Rader served together [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5957</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://www.717madisonplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/2012-7156-excerpt-1.mp3" length="324406" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confirmation Hearing for Raymond Chen</title>
		<link>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5945</link>
		<comments>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5945#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Senate Judiciary Committee quietly conducted the confirmation hearing for Raymond Chen last Wednesday.  While only three senators on the committee were present for the hearing, the questioning was refreshingly more patent-centric than in recent hearings for Federal Circuit nominees.
The video of the April 24th hearing is available at this page: [Link].
You can view the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5945</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re Karl Urquhart</title>
		<link>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5940</link>
		<comments>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5940#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Circuit recently affirmed the PTO in the appeal of In re Karl Urquhart by way of a Rule 36 Judgment.  The oral argument is of interest in that it addresses broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI) of claim language as well as functional language.
Claim 13 of the application was one of the claims at issue. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5940</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/Audiomp3/2012-1691.mp3" length="8136432" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audio of Oral Argument in AMP v. Myriad</title>
		<link>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5899</link>
		<comments>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5899#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court Oral Arguments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has released the audio of the oral argument in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
You can listen to the oral argument here: [Listen].
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5899</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://www.717madisonplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/12-398.mp3" length="32064510" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oral Argument by Telephone</title>
		<link>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5876</link>
		<comments>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5876#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 16:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Circuit illustrated its flexibility last month by conducting an oral argument with one of the parties participating by telephone.  It appeared to be a rare circumstance.  The oral argument was scheduled for March 7th and a snowstorm along the East Coast caused many flights to be canceled.  So, in this particular circumstance the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5876</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/Audiomp3/2012-1550.mp3" length="5589504" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audio of Oral Argument in FTC v. Actavis</title>
		<link>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5873</link>
		<comments>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5873#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.717madisonplace.com/?p=5873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has now posted the audio of the oral argument that took place on Monday in FTC v. Actavis.  The recording of the oral argument is available here.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.717madisonplace.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=5873</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://www.717madisonplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/12-416.mp3" length="29153248" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
