How would Shakespeare construe the claim?

250px-thomas_keene_in_macbeth_1884_wikipedia_crop4 In the oral argument in WNS Holdings, LLC, v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 2009-1498 (Fed. Cir. March 8, 2010), the attorney for UPS used an analogy to Shakespeare’s “The Tragedy of Macbeth” for purposes of arguing his claim construction case: [Listen].

Perhaps Shakespearean analogies are the key to winning at the Federal Circuit.  UPS prevailed on the appeal.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010 at 5:48 pm and is filed under Claim construction, Humorous. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.