35 U.S.C. § Charlie Foxtrot

I often find myself telling clients that the law surrounding 35 U.S.C. §101 is in a state of flux.  Others might argue that clusterflux would be a more apt description.

Judge Bryson made a fitting observation about 35 U.S.C. §101 during the oral argument of PerkinElmer, Inc. et al. v. Intema Ltd., 2011-1577 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 20, 2012).  He noted that when it comes to questions, §101 is a gift that never stops giving.  [Listen].

Comments are closed.