{"id":10772,"date":"2019-10-31T11:22:37","date_gmt":"2019-10-31T17:22:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/?p=10772"},"modified":"2019-10-31T11:27:51","modified_gmt":"2019-10-31T17:27:51","slug":"supplemental-briefs-filed-in-ptab-judges-appointment-clause-case-arthrex-v-smith-nephew","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/?p=10772","title":{"rendered":"Supplemental Briefs filed in PTAB Judges Appointments Clause case &#8212; Arthrex v. Smith &#038; Nephew"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The supplemental briefs requested by the Federal Circuit concerning whether PTAB judges were constitutionally appointed have been entered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They are available below:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-file\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/2018-2140-Supp-DOJ-Brief.pdf\">Supp-Brief-DOJ<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/2018-2140-Supp-DOJ-Brief.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button\" download>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-file\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Supp-Brief-Arthrex.pdf\">Supp-Brief-Arthrex<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Supp-Brief-Arthrex.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button\" download>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-file\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Supp-Brief-SmithNephew.pdf\">Supp-Brief-SmithNephew<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Supp-Brief-SmithNephew.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button\" download>Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p> My guess is that this issue is headed for en banc review.  Hopefully, the Federal Circuit does so publicly, rather than in secret, so that amicus briefs can be filed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The supplemental briefs requested by the Federal Circuit concerning whether PTAB judges were constitutionally appointed have been entered. They are available below: My guess is that this issue is headed for en banc review. Hopefully, the Federal Circuit does so publicly, rather than in secret, so that amicus briefs can be filed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10772"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10772"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10772\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10779,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10772\/revisions\/10779"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10772"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10772"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10772"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}