{"id":45,"date":"2009-06-30T15:33:36","date_gmt":"2009-06-30T22:33:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/?p=45"},"modified":"2009-07-28T17:30:48","modified_gmt":"2009-07-28T23:30:48","slug":"construing-real-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/?p=45","title":{"rendered":"Construing &#8220;Real-time&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Inventors often emphasize that one of the distinguishing features of their invention is that it can operate in &#8220;real-time&#8221; versus the slower working of the prior art.\u00a0 However, just what &#8220;real-time&#8221; entails can be quite difficult for a patent attorney to define and for the public to grasp from reading a\u00a0patent&#8217;s\u00a0claims, specification, and prosecution history.\u00a0 In the oral argument for <strong><em>Netcurrents Information Services, Inc. v. Dow Jones and Co.<\/em><\/strong>, the entire oral argument was spent trying to understand how &#8220;real-time&#8221; should be construed and whether the district court erred in its grant of summary judgment based on its construction of &#8220;real-time.&#8221;\u00a0 Despite the lengthy oral argument, the Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment in a non-precedential per curiam opinion under Federal Circuit Rule 36 (i.e., no explanation given for the affirmance).\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In addition to the fact that this oral argument highlights how difficult it can be to adequately define &#8220;real-time,&#8221; this case is also interesting in this interchange between one of the judges on the panel and counsel for the defendant\/appellee where the judge recites a passage from the Summary of the\u00a0patent and the attorney responds by citing a passage from the Abstract.\u00a0 It should highlight to patent prosecutors the importance of those sections when drafting an application:\u00a0<strong>[<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/2009-1019-excerpt.mp3\"><strong>Listen<\/strong><\/a><strong>].<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Inventors often emphasize that one of the distinguishing features of their invention is that it can operate in &#8220;real-time&#8221; versus the slower working of the prior art.\u00a0 However, just what &#8220;real-time&#8221; entails can be quite difficult for a patent attorney to define and for the public to grasp from reading a\u00a0patent&#8217;s\u00a0claims, specification, and prosecution history.\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=45"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":306,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45\/revisions\/306"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=45"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=45"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.717madisonplace.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=45"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}